top of page
Search

FEL 2: The Importance of Conceptual Design in Project Development

Front-End Loading (FEL) is an essential technique applied to project management and particularly important in industries such as upstream oil and gas, mining, and construction that involve large capital investments. It centers on subdividing a program into discrete steps with sufficient effort being dedicated during the planning to minimize the prospect of increased costs during implementation. FEL 2 or the Conceptual Design phase is the second of this process, and it is also very important for the further development of the project.


Understanding FEL 2: The Conceptual Design Phase

Understanding FEL 2: The Conceptual Design Phase


FEL 2 must move the project from vision established in FEL 1, the feasibility phase, into a more robust conceptual plan. This phase is maybe the only phase of the project that fully turn the high level project plan into a concrete idea. It is to compare and select a number of ways to design the project that are feasible, affordable, effective, and have low risk. FEL 2 is used in the identification of the most appropriate routes before the definition of detailed engineering processes in FEL 3.


Key deliverables in FEL 2 include:


  • Initial project scope definition

  • Preliminary engineering and process design

  • Conceptual cost estimates

  • Risk assessments and mitigation strategies

  • Development of project execution strategies

  • Updated project schedules


FEL 2 essentially provides a framework within which the right decisions are made as it outlines the best options, provides preliminary designs and then formulates a broad framework.


Why Is FEL 2 Important?

Why Is FEL 2 Important?


FEL 2 is unique in that it helps to eliminate unsuitable project options from consideration, thereby reducing the time and money that will be spent. Lack of conceptual design and evaluation at this stage may result in the project having wrong designs, or costs that are going to be very hard to meet during the value delivery phase leading to costly redesigning.


1. Risk Mitigation


The potential of the occurrence of risks is one of the main goals set for FEL 2, and the avoidance of their development is also considered. This is done through undertaking significant risk analysis and developing plans for handling the same. In this way, the team can define possible technical, financial, and operational threats in order to state the strategies which minimize their effects. For instance, selection of material or construction method is compared to ensure that construction cost is not blown or construction time taken is not blown.


2. Cost Control


Conceptual design ensures that the right cost estimates are developed this is an important factor in gaining approvals from stakeholders. FEL 2 often provides a user with an estimate range with a margin of error from ± 25% to ±50%. Such estimates help to bring more clarity to the project team in terms of financials, and keep the project on track financially during detailed design and implementing phases.


3. Alignment with Stakeholder Expectations


The implication of the stakeholders is crucial at the conceptual design phase. As discussed in FEL 2, stakeholders such as investors, contractors and end-users can be consulted and their expectations met hence conforming to the project’s objective. This phase gives one chance to confirm the scope of a project as well as an avenue to get comments on the acknowledged design. There are issues that require comparison to find the misalignments that would entail costly changes and all of them could be managed at start.


The Process of FEL 2: A Step-by-Step Breakdown

The Process of FEL 2: A Step-by-Step Breakdown


FEL 2 includes a screened step by step approach to the assessment of project ideas in order to guarantee that the chosen option best suits the project goals. Below is a step-by-step breakdown of what typically happens during this phase:


1. Refining the Project Scope


The project scope which was partially outlined in FEL 1 is expanded in FEL 2. This entails enhancing the definition of the project objectives and scope, criterion of design and operational characteristic. In defining the project scope, therefore, the project team engages the stakeholders in the business to understand and respond to their needs and realities on the ground.


2. Preliminary Design


However, depending on how the scope is defined, preliminary design starts after this step of analysis is over. This is where such technical aspects of the project as project schedule, project scope, project planning, and project management are determined. It produces preliminary sketches of process flows, arrangements of equipment, and construction of facilities. For multi-disciplinary project, the designs are analyzed a number of times to find out the best design sequence. The aim is to cover the basic requirements in the field of utilitarian and safety objectives, not taking into account the minutiae of the engineering tasks that will be solved at the next stages of the project.


3. Cost Estimation


Budget estimating during FEL 2 is concerned with the generation of conceptual cost estimates. It is not necessary to point out that these estimates are not very articulated, at the same time, they give sufficient information about financial initiatives which are needed for the project. Predictions factor in Capital cost (Capex), operational cost (Opex) and overhead costs or risk costs. With referencing of the best industry standards and previous records, the project team develops the lowest risk measures that afford adequate assurance for the setting of budget.


Risk Assessments

4. Risk Assessments


The potential risks are also determined in FEL 2. It can therefore be technical, operational, environmental, or financial. These are assessed, and the team comes up with measures in case the risk materializes. For instance, in the event that a particular material is rated as high-risk concerning matters relating to the supply chain network, the company may consider the use of other materials in this phase.


5. Project Execution Strategy


It gives an overall plan of how the project will be carried out and was established during FEL 2 of executions strategy. These plans include the choice of delivery method, means to select the contractor, acquisition approach and the planned project timeline. Out of FEL 2, a strategy provides the base for the execution plan that is refined within FEL 3.


6. Environmental and Regulatory Considerations


With reference to the Industry and the location of the project some projects might be faced with environmental and regulatory consideration. FEL 2 is the one where these aspects are considered and incorporated into designs. For instance for a project that in some way affects an area either through the construction of a facility close to this area, then EIAs will be required. Some regulatory authorities may demand documentation in this phase to guarantee that the project is in consonance with the laws of the region, country and other nations.


Conclusion

Final Thoughts


FEL 2 is fondly referred to as the Conceptual Design phase, and in many ways this phase marks a transition from early feasibility studies to design proper. The result of such efforts is increased likelihood for project success due to detailed analysis fundamental to feasibility studies, exploration, cost assessment, and risk evaluation. When FEL 2 is done correctly, projects advance with a guided course of action that is practically achievable and meets stakeholders’ expectations within the scope of the organizations’ budget.


In the long run, the time and resources invested in FEL 2 give benefits in avoiding risk, cutting cost and guaranteeing that the project stays on track for the remaining phases of the project. Through best practice and aiming to make data-driven, collaborative decisions, teams can utilise FEL 2 to establish the basis for the successful project outcome.

6 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page